TEFS is about equality of opportunity for all students regardless of background, gender, disability or race.
University: UK: Access: Social Mobility: Government: Fairness: Equality: Equity: College: School: Education: Higher Education: Further Education
Subscribe to this blog
Follow by Email
Search This Blog
Always late or better late than never with student support
The government made a surprise decision today to inject a further £50 million into universities in England to support students experiencing financial hardship. It is a very late move triggered by increasing pressure in the last few weeks. There has not been a mass exodus of students from universities so far this academic year but universities must be experiencing considerable problems with student engagement (TEFS19th January 2021). Although very late, the funding is essential to avoid a larger shortfall in attainment by many students with fewer resources. Hopefully, it will be easy to access and not already too late as the situation worsens.
However, the government has fully acknowledged for the first time since the pandemic started that there is a problem. This is despite numerous warnings. It seems that their attitude has softened a bit with, “The new funding means that universities will be able to help students impacted by the pandemic, for example those facing additional costs for alternative accommodation, loss of employment, or extra costs to access their teaching online”.
There has been growing concern about how students with disadvantages and fewer resources would cope since universities locked down near the end of the last academic year. There was the obvious multiplier effect of poor accommodation, lack of money for living costs, patchy internet access, and the loss of part-time jobs. Yet the government turned to supporting universities first, and especially research, not students.
Plucking numbers out of thin air.
The problem is identifying where the figure of £50 million came from. It is hard to believe that data has been gathered from around the sector to identify the shortfall. The response from Universities UK, through its Chief Executive, was very short and somewhat ambivalent on direct financial support for students. Whilst acknowledging that “Financial hardship has been a growing problem throughout this pandemic” he also noted the need for more for the university as “further funding to alleviate the substantial increases in demand that university wellbeing and support services are experiencing." This response implies two things. Firstly, the Universities may not have raised this issue directly in any substantial way with the government. Secondly, that the Department of Education (DfE) did not gather data in advance to gauge the real extent of the problem. Both seem likely.
At the time of writing the Office for Students (OfS) has not responded as they await further instruction. They were responsible for administering the £20 million addition in December 2020 (OfS 18th December 2020). The priorities were set out by the DfE and stressed widening support beyond those usually supported by the student access fund. It is assumed that similar advice will emerge for the latest funding.
The simple fact is the government cut the so-called access fund by £21 million from the £277 million in 2019/20 to £256 million in 2020/21 (see TEFS 11th September 2021 ‘Government response to digital poverty, job losses, and student hardship: A £21 million cut to its support’). The release of £50 million is in addition to the £20 million announced in December, bringing the apparent total this year to £70 million. However, it represents much less extra in response to the pandemic and its effects. Billed as “New funding will go to universities to help students facing financial difficulties arising from the impact of coronavirus”, it is far less than the reported “£70 million for this financial year”. It is in fact only an extra £49 million on top of the figure for 2019/20. Why did it take until December 2020 to wake up to a problem?
Task force on student support and access called for.
TEFS wrote an open letter to Donelan, and the other University Ministers in the UK jurisdictions, to seek setting up a ‘Taskforce for Student Support’. While her counterpart ministers were supportive to some extent, Donelan ignored the plea in her letter to TEFS. She merely confirmed that £256 million was available to help students, despite this already being in place, as the access fund intended for other uses, and a cut from the previous year. The Government had already decided to advance the fee income to help universities, not students. But this was simply offering help akin to a ‘payday loan’. It was only a short-term measure (see TEFS 4th May 2020 ‘Universities to get 'payday loan' sticking plaster’).
It is hard to pin down why the government seems to have such a ‘blind spot’ about students in difficulty (TEFS 5th June 2020 ‘Blind spot about student finances cruelly exposed by COVID-19 crisis’). It could be limited perception and a lack of experience. After all, they come from well-off backgrounds and had a comfortable university education. University is therefore seen as something that happens in this context. They may then see it as certain that families will always support their offspring at university. Yet the government can hardly have missed the warning signs. Yes, most university students do not have part-time jobs and are supported by their families. But rising unemployment in the pandemic is changing that landscape fast. Many more are experiencing the lack of support endured by a minority of students over the years. The system has been unequal for a long time. Disadvantaged students and those from low participation areas do not get the same resources and help as their better off peers. All the data points to that simple fact.
The alternative is that Westminster is harbouring a government intent on keeping the status quo in their favour. Donelan let her guard slip in a response to questions at an Education Committee evidence session on 15th July 2020 with a flippant dismissal “It doesn’t matter about looking at which groups don’t get to university” (TEFS 15th July 2020 "It doesn't matter about looking at which groups don't get to university"). By then, a limited and late response to calls for student support already looked like it would be simply wilful indifference.
Mike Larkin, retired from Queen's University Belfast after 37 years teaching Microbiology, Biochemistry and Genetics. He has served on the Senate and Finance and planning committee of a Russell Group University.
UPDATE 8th August 2020 Things are moving fast today with severe criticism mounting about Ofqual and SQA, and urgent action is needed. TEFS has laid out ten points that should be considered to reverse out of the crumbling mess. Fairness should replace 'maintaining standards' as the primary objective. The government must cease trying to defend a system that acts as a barrier to the less advantaged. Since posting yesterday, things have been moving fast. Today the Guardian put the examinations issue in large print on its front page with ‘Nearly 40% of A-level result predictions to be downgraded in England’ . This conclusion came about after some great detective work by former medical statistician, Huy Duong, who analysed the data available and reconciled this with the Ofqual announcement that there could have been a 12% inflation in higher grades. It seems that Ofqual have been caught red handed and "Duong’s findings were privately confirmed to the Guardian by ex
This week confirmed beyond any doubt that Ofqual is pointing the finger of blame for the public examinations chaos this summer firmly at the government and its ministers. The positions of Schools Minister, Nick Gibb and Education Secretary, Gavin Williamson must be on the line. When Williamson is confronted by the Education Committee next week, like Momus he may find his mask has slipped and cannot lay blame anywhere else. He might be meeting his Nemesis and find he is expelled from his lofty position. Called to account. On Wednesday morning, Education Secretary, Gavin Williamson, Education Permanent Secretary, Susan Acland-Hood, and Director for Qualifications, Michelle Dyson, will be called to account by the Education Committee. With the redoubtable Robert Halfon in the chair, they will face a hard time. This is because Halfon and his colleagues will be armed with more documentary evidence from Ofqual and others that look bad for both ministers. All of the correspo
UPDATE 23rd March 2021 Since this idea was posted in January, there has been considerable thought across the sector about what would be best for the future. These are very well laid out in a collection of short essays reported last week by the Higher Education Policy Institute (HEPI). The twelve essays, from different authors and different perspectives, in ‘Where next for university admissions? ’ are edited by Rachel Hewitt who sets out the many pitfalls surrounding examinations and university admissions. It seems there are those in favour of post qualification admission (PQA) to university as it should help the least advantaged students. However, arguments against this are presented that means caution must be taken. A powerful response to the HEPI report by the 'The Fair Access Coalition: 10 requirements for a fair admissions process' adds further to the debate. The suggestions are sensible but falls short on demanding adequate resources for students throughout their studi