Skip to main content

Open Letter to UK Government Ministers - taskforce on student support urgently needed

TEFS has called for more urgent consideration of the plight of students who rely on part-time jobs in the UK. The loss of jobs will also extend into the summer months with some students having no financial support from any quarter. The outlook is bleak. Government ministers with responsibility for universities in each of the UK jurisdictions have been written to today to ask for urgent action on a 'Taskforce on student support'.  Emphasis should now turn to students as well as research. The alternative is a retreat on advances on widening access and social mobility achieve in recent years.


An article in the Guardian this week 'University students who work part-time need support – or they will drop out' reported Freedom of Information responses from eighty universities around the UK about student working hours and help available. It instead highlighted an almost competed lack of knowledge about the number of hours students divert to paid employment in term time. Yet in numerous surveys, the proportion of students who rely on income from part-time jobs has been increasing year on year. A further increase was observed by the Advance HE/ Higher Education Policy Institute (HEPI) in its 'Student Academic Experience Survey 2020'. Since March, a catastrophic loss of income has exerted massive pressure on those students affected and will continue into the coming academic year. This will be further exacerbated by fewer jobs available in the summer months. This has been highlighted by Becca Bland of the charity Standalone in the Guardian today with 'Students estranged from their families could end up destitute this summer'.  It brings to the fore the terrible situation that students with no family support must endure with no income from job or benefits.

A call for more joined-up action.

Every university has been reacting fast to the need to help students in hardship. But the tide will keep coming in and a more coordinated approach is needed. Every University is affected across the whole of the UK and it is time to coordinate and disseminate best practice from the wider sector.

Below is an open letter that has been sent today to each Government Minister with responsibility for Universities across the various UK jurisdictions. IIn addition to Gavin Williamson, it has also been sent to Michelle Donelan and Amanda Solloway in England, John Swinney in Scotland, Kirsty Williams in Wales and Peter Weir and Diane Dodds in Northern Ireland.




Comments

Post a Comment

Constructive comments please.
Did you have a free Higher Education?

Popular posts from this blog

Students working in term-time: Commuter students and their working patterns

This article and analysis shows that commuter students are more likely to be employed in term time and also more likely to work longer hours. Two recent studies of commuter students ( one a quantitative and the other a qualitative analysis ) attending six universities in the London area revealed that commuter students were at a disadvantage in terms of outcome when compared to their peers. There is an urgent need for institutions to consider the actual time that their students have to study as the main measure. This is a way to integrate the time pressures of other activities such as commuting and employment that all add up to less time for studying. The general conclusion of the two studies was that “travel time remained a significant predictor of student progression or continuation for UK-domiciled full time undergraduates at three of the six London institutions”. This is perhaps not surprising for someone who spends much of the day travelling and the recommendation is that ...
2 comments
Read more

Post Qualification Admissions and DfE Consultation… Consultation… Consultation!

It seems the Department for Education (DfE) is governing by a process of endless consultations as a smoke screen to hide underlying strategy. The latest on Post Qualification Admissions has already decided to cease teachers’ grade predictions as part of the university admission system and offers only two options in a Hobsons choice. Its purpose appears to be making the process fairer for less advantaged students but might make matters worse. Many well-informed observers are getting very concerned. The decision is predicated on two assumptions. Firstly, that teachers tend to under predict the grades for disadvantaged students who may go onto get higher grades and miss out on courses at university with higher entry requirements. Secondly, that the examination grades are an accurate reflection of a student’s ability and teachers are simply getting it wrong. Neither are strictly correct, and this post is a longer one as it examines some of the flaws in the decision making by the DfE, led b...
Post a Comment
Read more