Skip to main content

Augar, Second Class Citizens and another review

Since posting the last TEFS Blog on Friday 17th January 2020, there have been three significant developments that are further reinforcing TEFS call for a comprehensive review of all university funding (TEFS 17th January 2020 ‘Student support and the research environment at universities’). “A fundamental review is needed. The promised report on the review of the Teaching Excellence Framework (TEF) from 2018 has yet to emerge and its delay is concerning”. There is now an urgent need to pull all the strands of funding for our universities together and formulate a proper plan. Staff must have more stable careers and students must all get an equal chance to succeed. Neither aspiration matches the current situation that has developed in our universities across the UK. Casting the system into a false ‘free market’ defines a Government that is lacking in responsibility.

To outsiders, it seems that the government is taking a piecemeal approach to funding. With the Brexit chaos continuing, this is compounded by short-term economic fixes. However, this week it appears that there may be an underlying and somewhat cryptic ‘masterplan’ for universities that spells ‘marketisation max’. The omens are not looking good for the sustainability of many of our universities and the wellbeing and careers of many staff. The care and the financial support for students in most need look like they will continue to dissipate. Universities will simply continue to ‘compete’ for students who can afford it and will urgently need to diversify their income if it declines further. This will be done by minimising the costs of teaching students with little regard for an increasing number of temporary staff and the instability and chaos that this brings.

Augar has not gone away.

Today the Minister of State for Universities, Science, Research and Innovation, Chris Skidmore announced that the Augar review would be considered in the next spending review. This is set for later in 2020 and the hope is that it will be a full-blown multiyear review. However, the proviso is that a Brexit deal is settled and there is a degree of stability in the economy. Failing that, it would lead to yet another temporary spending round.

In September, the government set out temporary 12-month spending plans with “This Spending Round sets out the government’s spending plans for 2020-21…… A full multi-year spending review will follow in 2020” (Policy paper: Spending Round 2019. 4 September 2019). In answer to a question in the House of Commons today, Skidmore confirmed that the Augar review would form part of the upcoming spending round. This news must send shivers down the spines of university managements as they fear income from fees will suddenly fall. His brief response today is shown in the very short video below.  
Casualisation of the academic workforce and ‘Second Class Citizens’.

To add to the trepidation, also today University and College Union (UCU) launched a major report into the increasing ‘casualisation’ of academic positions with ‘Second class academic citizens: The dehumanising effects of casualisation in higher education’. It reinforces the stark findings of the Wellcome Trust report out last week, ‘What researchers think about the culture they work in’ and extends the concerns across the whole sector. It is a shocking indictment of a situation that has been deteriorating for many years (see TEFS 17th January 2020 ‘Student support and the research environment at universities’).

The negative impact on the mental health of staff has a severe knock-on effect on the provision for students and this is becoming all too evident. Chris Skidmore also acknowledged the UCU report in another response in  Parliament today but seemed very uncomfortable. He should be because more cuts will lead to further entrenchment of a severe problem by university managements. In a feeble defence, he voiced his support for the ‘Concordat’ for researchers that was updated in September of last year (‘The Concordat to Support the Career Development of Researchers’). It has been a well-meaning platitude with no teeth since 2008 and the Wellcome and UCU reports simply demonstrate that it is not being honoured. It is effectively meaningless in the current environment.

OfS and further cuts in teaching budgets.

Meanwhile, the Office for Students (OfS) – that is the regulatory body for universities in England – announced on Friday that it was ‘consulting’ universities about further cuts to the teaching budget (Consultation on implementing savings in academic years 2019-20 and 2020-21). This is in the context of gradual cuts since 2012 that aim to replace government grants with

fee income from students (see Figure 1 for the context). A recent House of Commons Library briefing from last December provides an excellent background to the context and trends with ‘Higher education funding in England’. Those in government should be fully aware of what they are doing.

The Secretary of State for Education, Gavin Williamson, had sent the OfS a very simple letter earlier in January setting out the cuts and his priorities. The headline figure is a saving of £58 million in the financial year 2020‑21. But underneath this is worse news that the cut will be £26 million over the rest of this academic year and £70 million over the coming 2020/21 academic year. There is little chance of it being increased in the coming years. The planners in our universities will be burning the midnight oil. They are getting very little notice.

The cuts over the years have been very deep as they were replaced by less certain income from fees. Research support funds linked to REF have been maintained but this is highly selective with the bulk of the funding going to the Russell Group institutions and then mostly to the pre 92 universities. In England, the research support is selectively targeted by applying the REF rating that currently goes back to 2014. The next REF is in 2021 and further this piles on the uncertainty.

It is becoming obvious that the government is slowly paring grant support for teaching to the bone. The £1.6 billion in student maintenance grants in 2015/16 has already been reduced to zero since they were abolished in 2016/17. There have been many calls to bring them back, but the saving is so large it looks less likely. Interestingly, this figure is close to the £1.3 billion per year that TEFS calculates would be needed to alleviate the part-time job burden of students who work over 10 hours per week (TEFS 29th November 2019 ‘The cost of equalising the HE experience’). This is the cost of giving every student an equal amount of time to study. Setting out with that aim and designing the system around it with a robust professional career structure for staff would be a better way to reboot and start again.



Mike Larkin, retired from Queen's University Belfast after 37 years teaching Microbiology, Biochemistry and Genetics.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Bristol University student death: Inquest raises many concerns

The inquest into the tragic death of Bristol University Student, Ben Murray, took place this week; almost 12 months since he took his own life.* The coroner recorded a verdict of suicide earlier today but warned the University that it should make detailed inquiries after each death (BBC News ‘University of Bristol told to learn lessons after Ben Murray's suicide’ ). The anniversary of his death is this Sunday the 5th of May. Spring comes as a time of hope for most people but for others it can be a time of considerable anxiety and stress. This is especially the case for students approaching the examination period. As a close colleague of mine often pointed out, “they are all someone’s child”. Our hearts go out to the family of Ben Murray and friends as the inquest goes over again the events of a year ago. The pain is further exacerbated by media reports that he had little or no support in what was his first year at university. The BBC reported that ‘Bristol University studen

Ofqual holding back information

Ofqual has responded to an FOI request from TEFS this week. They held a staggering twenty-nine board meetings since March. Despite promising the Parliamentary Education Committee over a month ago they would publish the minutes “shortly” after their meeting on 16th September, they are still not able to do so. They cite “exemption for information that is intended to be published in the future” for minutes that are in the “process of being approved for publication” . More concerning is they are also citing exemption under the “Public Interest Test”. This means they might not be published, and Ofqual will open themselves up to legal challenges. If both the Department for Education and Ofqual are prevented from being more open, then public interest will lie shattered on the floor and lessons will not be learned.  Ofqual finally responded to the TEFS Freedom of Information (FOI) request to publish the minutes of its board meetings on Tuesday. It should have been replied to by 17th Septembe

The perfect storm for Universities PART TWO: The COVID-19 ‘time bomb blind-spot’

Pdf LINK PART ONE set out the context of the mounting predicament universities are finding themselves in around the rise in student numbers coming down the line. PART TWO looks at the immediate burden of more students finding themselves in financial difficulty. Loss of income sources for many students will be compounded by families at home losing their incomes as the recession bites before Christmas. It will impact 'middle-class' families unused to the idea of poverty and add to the growing numbers of students seeking help. The government and universities may be stumbling into another storm by failing to see the extent of the problem because of a ‘blind spot’ in their understanding. TEFS has received reassurances directly from each of the UK Universities ministers, but they are putting too much faith in university administered hardship funds as their only fallback position. This brings many problems with it as the ministers reject a TEFS call for a UK wide task force on