Skip to main content

Augar, Second Class Citizens and another review

Since posting the last TEFS Blog on Friday 17th January 2020, there have been three significant developments that are further reinforcing TEFS call for a comprehensive review of all university funding (TEFS 17th January 2020 ‘Student support and the research environment at universities’). “A fundamental review is needed. The promised report on the review of the Teaching Excellence Framework (TEF) from 2018 has yet to emerge and its delay is concerning”. There is now an urgent need to pull all the strands of funding for our universities together and formulate a proper plan. Staff must have more stable careers and students must all get an equal chance to succeed. Neither aspiration matches the current situation that has developed in our universities across the UK. Casting the system into a false ‘free market’ defines a Government that is lacking in responsibility.

To outsiders, it seems that the government is taking a piecemeal approach to funding. With the Brexit chaos continuing, this is compounded by short-term economic fixes. However, this week it appears that there may be an underlying and somewhat cryptic ‘masterplan’ for universities that spells ‘marketisation max’. The omens are not looking good for the sustainability of many of our universities and the wellbeing and careers of many staff. The care and the financial support for students in most need look like they will continue to dissipate. Universities will simply continue to ‘compete’ for students who can afford it and will urgently need to diversify their income if it declines further. This will be done by minimising the costs of teaching students with little regard for an increasing number of temporary staff and the instability and chaos that this brings.

Augar has not gone away.

Today the Minister of State for Universities, Science, Research and Innovation, Chris Skidmore announced that the Augar review would be considered in the next spending review. This is set for later in 2020 and the hope is that it will be a full-blown multiyear review. However, the proviso is that a Brexit deal is settled and there is a degree of stability in the economy. Failing that, it would lead to yet another temporary spending round.

In September, the government set out temporary 12-month spending plans with “This Spending Round sets out the government’s spending plans for 2020-21…… A full multi-year spending review will follow in 2020” (Policy paper: Spending Round 2019. 4 September 2019). In answer to a question in the House of Commons today, Skidmore confirmed that the Augar review would form part of the upcoming spending round. This news must send shivers down the spines of university managements as they fear income from fees will suddenly fall. His brief response today is shown in the very short video below.  
Casualisation of the academic workforce and ‘Second Class Citizens’.

To add to the trepidation, also today University and College Union (UCU) launched a major report into the increasing ‘casualisation’ of academic positions with ‘Second class academic citizens: The dehumanising effects of casualisation in higher education’. It reinforces the stark findings of the Wellcome Trust report out last week, ‘What researchers think about the culture they work in’ and extends the concerns across the whole sector. It is a shocking indictment of a situation that has been deteriorating for many years (see TEFS 17th January 2020 ‘Student support and the research environment at universities’).

The negative impact on the mental health of staff has a severe knock-on effect on the provision for students and this is becoming all too evident. Chris Skidmore also acknowledged the UCU report in another response in  Parliament today but seemed very uncomfortable. He should be because more cuts will lead to further entrenchment of a severe problem by university managements. In a feeble defence, he voiced his support for the ‘Concordat’ for researchers that was updated in September of last year (‘The Concordat to Support the Career Development of Researchers’). It has been a well-meaning platitude with no teeth since 2008 and the Wellcome and UCU reports simply demonstrate that it is not being honoured. It is effectively meaningless in the current environment.

OfS and further cuts in teaching budgets.

Meanwhile, the Office for Students (OfS) – that is the regulatory body for universities in England – announced on Friday that it was ‘consulting’ universities about further cuts to the teaching budget (Consultation on implementing savings in academic years 2019-20 and 2020-21). This is in the context of gradual cuts since 2012 that aim to replace government grants with

fee income from students (see Figure 1 for the context). A recent House of Commons Library briefing from last December provides an excellent background to the context and trends with ‘Higher education funding in England’. Those in government should be fully aware of what they are doing.

The Secretary of State for Education, Gavin Williamson, had sent the OfS a very simple letter earlier in January setting out the cuts and his priorities. The headline figure is a saving of £58 million in the financial year 2020‑21. But underneath this is worse news that the cut will be £26 million over the rest of this academic year and £70 million over the coming 2020/21 academic year. There is little chance of it being increased in the coming years. The planners in our universities will be burning the midnight oil. They are getting very little notice.

The cuts over the years have been very deep as they were replaced by less certain income from fees. Research support funds linked to REF have been maintained but this is highly selective with the bulk of the funding going to the Russell Group institutions and then mostly to the pre 92 universities. In England, the research support is selectively targeted by applying the REF rating that currently goes back to 2014. The next REF is in 2021 and further this piles on the uncertainty.

It is becoming obvious that the government is slowly paring grant support for teaching to the bone. The £1.6 billion in student maintenance grants in 2015/16 has already been reduced to zero since they were abolished in 2016/17. There have been many calls to bring them back, but the saving is so large it looks less likely. Interestingly, this figure is close to the £1.3 billion per year that TEFS calculates would be needed to alleviate the part-time job burden of students who work over 10 hours per week (TEFS 29th November 2019 ‘The cost of equalising the HE experience’). This is the cost of giving every student an equal amount of time to study. Setting out with that aim and designing the system around it with a robust professional career structure for staff would be a better way to reboot and start again.

Mike Larkin, retired from Queen's University Belfast after 37 years teaching Microbiology, Biochemistry and Genetics.


Popular posts from this blog

A radical overhaul of examinations is needed as soon as possible: UPDATE

UPDATE 23rd March 2021 Since this idea was posted in January, there has been considerable thought across the sector about what would be best for the future. These are very well laid out in a collection of short essays reported last week by the Higher Education Policy Institute (HEPI). The twelve essays, from different authors and different perspectives, in  ‘Where next for university admissions? ’ are edited by Rachel Hewitt  who sets out the many pitfalls surrounding examinations and university admissions. It seems there are those in favour of post qualification admission (PQA) to university as it should help the least advantaged students. However, arguments against this are presented that means caution must be taken. A powerful response to the HEPI report by the  'The Fair Access Coalition: 10 requirements for a fair admissions process' adds further to the debate. The suggestions are sensible but falls short on demanding adequate resources for students throughout their studi

Qfqual builds a concrete wall: UPDATED

UPDATE 8th August 2020 Things are moving fast today with severe criticism mounting about Ofqual and SQA, and urgent action is needed. TEFS has laid out ten points that should be considered to reverse out of the crumbling mess. Fairness should replace 'maintaining standards' as the primary objective. The government must cease trying to defend a system that acts as a barrier to the less advantaged. Since posting yesterday, things have been moving fast. Today the Guardian put the examinations issue in large print on its front page with ‘Nearly 40% of A-level result predictions to be downgraded in England’ . This conclusion came about after some great detective work by former medical statistician, Huy Duong, who analysed the data available and reconciled this with the Ofqual announcement that there could have been a 12% inflation in higher grades. It seems that Ofqual have been caught red handed and "Duong’s findings were privately confirmed to the Guardian by ex

The next labour of Ofqual is announced: Social mobility UPDATE

UPDATE 1st March2021  Since writing this post, there has been valuable analysis added to the worsening situation by Lee Elliot-Major, Chair of Social Mobility at Exeter University and former head of the Sutton Trust. His article in The Guardian today, ‘How do we ensure disadvantaged kids don't lose out in England's new exam system?’  concludes that “it will be long after this summer’s exam grade battles that we will comprehend the full consequences this pandemic has had on young people.” That could be an understatement as the idea of ‘social mobility’ unravels fast. He cites a recent research publication with colleagues at the LSE Centre for Economic Performance  entitled  ‘Unequal learning and labour market losses in the crisis: consequences for social mobility’ . This is a detailed and rigorous analysis and survey that should set alarm bells ringing in government in the run-up to the budget this week. The evidence is stark as the “education and labour market losses due to C