Skip to main content

Waiting for Augar......... UPDATE: Can Augar survive the 'bombardment'?

Since posting ‘Waiting for Augar’ on Friday, more has happened over the weekend that further feeds the chaos surrounding consideration of post-18 education. There are far too many conflicting views bouncing around and Augar must be steadfast in seeking to address unfairness and inequalities for students whilst remaining 'independent' in this turbid political environment.

The Telegraph reported on Sunday that Augar was likely to report “later this year” in 'University loans may be blocked if A-level students fail to get three Ds.' They add further strength to the existing rumour about minimum grades to qualify for loans with, “Whitehall sources said there was a "broad consensus" on the need for a national minimum threshold to help reduce the number of students taking "Mickey Mouse degrees" which cost more than £9,000 per year and do little to boost the salaries of graduates.” Surely such leaks constitute interference and pressure on Augar.

Meanwhile the Minister of State for Universities, Science, Research and Innovation, Chris Skidmore, protests on twitter that “the Augar post-18 review is an independent one which will reach its independent conclusions”.

Yet in his interview with Times Higher Education on the 7th of February ‘Chris Skidmore: don’t put a lid on university access’ he was reported as saying that he does not support the introduction of minimum grade thresholds for entering higher education. The very stuff of Augar.

It seems he was a little more careful in his speech at Nottingham Trent University* last week ‘Universities Minister calls for greater improvement on access’. This was very long on the extensive problems of widening access and not a great advert for his past government failures. These were addressed without a single mention of Augar. He also managed without any mention of the financial difficulties of so called ‘disadvantaged students’. He failed to address the practical problems that bedevil widening access such living and maintenance costs or rising accommodation costs. Hopefully Augar will.

 *Note that Edward Peck is the Vice-chancellor of Nottingham Trent University and is on the Augar review panel.


Mike Larkin, retired from Queen's University Belfast after 37 years teaching Microbiology, Biochemistry and Genetics.

Comments

Post a Comment

Constructive comments please.
Did you have a free Higher Education?

Popular posts from this blog

Students working in term-time: Commuter students and their working patterns

This article and analysis shows that commuter students are more likely to be employed in term time and also more likely to work longer hours. Two recent studies of commuter students ( one a quantitative and the other a qualitative analysis ) attending six universities in the London area revealed that commuter students were at a disadvantage in terms of outcome when compared to their peers. There is an urgent need for institutions to consider the actual time that their students have to study as the main measure. This is a way to integrate the time pressures of other activities such as commuting and employment that all add up to less time for studying. The general conclusion of the two studies was that “travel time remained a significant predictor of student progression or continuation for UK-domiciled full time undergraduates at three of the six London institutions”. This is perhaps not surprising for someone who spends much of the day travelling and the recommendation is that ...
2 comments
Read more

Post Qualification Admissions and DfE Consultation… Consultation… Consultation!

It seems the Department for Education (DfE) is governing by a process of endless consultations as a smoke screen to hide underlying strategy. The latest on Post Qualification Admissions has already decided to cease teachers’ grade predictions as part of the university admission system and offers only two options in a Hobsons choice. Its purpose appears to be making the process fairer for less advantaged students but might make matters worse. Many well-informed observers are getting very concerned. The decision is predicated on two assumptions. Firstly, that teachers tend to under predict the grades for disadvantaged students who may go onto get higher grades and miss out on courses at university with higher entry requirements. Secondly, that the examination grades are an accurate reflection of a student’s ability and teachers are simply getting it wrong. Neither are strictly correct, and this post is a longer one as it examines some of the flaws in the decision making by the DfE, led b...
Post a Comment
Read more