Skip to main content

Going Dutch on Student Mental Health.

The announcement in June by Sam Gyimah, the Higher Education Minister, of a “new package of measures” on student mental health offers some hope and acknowledgement from government that there is indeed an increasing problem of poor mental health amongst our students. The proposed ‘University Mental Health Charter’ is a good idea but there is scant attention paid the plight of students that find themselves under crushing financial pressure. Recent observations in the Netherlands emphasise the need to accelerate our efforts in the UK. With so many young people about to embark upon their education after school in the next few weeks, it would be good if they could get better access to financial help as well as ‘mental wellbeing’ help in the coming months and years.

Hiding in the press in the last week was a report of increasing mental health problems amongst students in the Netherlands. Times Higher Education reported: ‘Dutch doctors warn student mental health problems are rising’ [1]. This arose from a short report in the Netherlands press: ‘More Dutch students struggle with psychological problems, university doctors say’ [2]. That report is one of the few that cites financial pressures and part-time jobs as a critical factor.

The doctors attribute the increase to more pressure to perform - both in their studies and on their social media accounts - and the fear of debt. The abolishment of the basic study grant means that students have to take out loans to study. To avoid falling into debt problems after their studies, many students take on extra jobs, which put extra pressure on them, the doctors said to the newspaper.” [2]

The increase in mental health problems amongst UK students has also been rising for many years. It is perhaps unsurprising given the financial pressures that students can find themselves under. However, the situation in the Netherlands appears to be a more recent change for them. A comparison of the factors involved in the UK and the Netherlands is therefore worth considering.

The  UK situation.

Most of the data noted here relates to England but the trends are generally similar across the UK. Mental health problems and widespread in the whole population across England [3]. At any one time, a sixth of the population in England aged 16 to 64 have a mental health problem [4]
The general mental health in the UK appears to be affected by socioeconomic status. This is to be expected with those under financial constraints likely to be the most vulnerable. If things go wrong there is no safety net and considerable fear anxiety can be associated with that. A recent briefing paper in April for the House of Commons gives an excellent overview of the situation in England [5]. It is established that common disorders such as depression and anxiety are widespread. Those in work are less likely to suffer from such problems than those out of work or working part-time. Under ‘Common mental disorders (CMD) by employment status’ it is noted that:

“Economically inactive and unemployed people are substantially more likely to have experienced a CMD in the last week than those who are in work. Those who work part-time are slightly more likely than those who work full-time to have experienced a CMD recently” [5]

This is reinforced in reports from the Mental Health Foundation that also show the serious effects of poverty on mental health [6]. The reports are based upon data from 2014 [7]. It most be noted that the situation in Northern Ireland stands out and is considerably worse due to the fall-out from conflicts of the past. The dramatic rise in suicides amongst young men since 2005 is particularly harrowing. However, it is acknowledged that the economic prospects for people in Northern Ireland are also a factor. It is noted that: “According to figures for 2014, more suicides occurred in areas of higher deprivation, with 46 suicides in 2014 occurring in the most deprived areas of Northern Ireland, compared to 13 in the least deprived areas". [8].

The Netherlands situation.

Mental health problems in the Netherlands are broadly similar to the UK; as indeed they are generally across most developed countries [9]. The rise in problems for students in the Netherlands is, however,  attributed to the abolition of study grants and introduction of loans [2]. This was not considered a problem until very recently. There have been major changes in the funding available to most students from January 2015 when grants were abolished[10]. Up to then, students could readily apply for grants that amounted to €279 per month if they did not live at home and €100 if they lived with their parents. Nevertheless, there was a strong ethos of students taking part-time jobs and many worked an average of 11 hours a week. Even then, degrees could take 4 to 5 years to complete. Under the new fees and loans system it was accepted that students would “accumulate greater debts or have to work more during their studies and risk prolonging the time-to-degree”. The rapid rise in cases of stress, depression and anxiety was surely inevitable.

Life for UK students.

In contrast, the situation in the UK seems to reflect a ‘heads in the sand’ approach on the issue of financial problems leading to stress and  mental health issues for students. Mental health problems amongst students across the UK has been documented and the fact that many come from well-off backgrounds makes this a puzzling paradox. The pressure to succeed seems to overwhelm some students who otherwise have a lot to look forward to.

In this respect, a report from Universities UK earlier in 2018 [11] made some sensible observations but did observe that: 

“Being the first in a family to attend university, and having to take up paid work while studying due to financial pressures have both been identified as risk factors for poor mental health among students

They also observed separately that the ‘drop out’ rate was higher amongst students from the lower participation areas listed as POLAR 1 [12]

However, many other reports to date rely heavily on evidence from a YouGov survey carried out in 2016 [13]. This questioned 1061 students and attempted to determine the extent of mental health problems in university students of all ages. Almost a quarter (24%) reported that they had a mental health problem and, of those that reported such, the main culprit was anxiety and depression. A clear majority (77%) indicated that they had a fear of failure. Socioeconomic (SEC) groups were reported only as grouped into two halves and there was no clear difference in results between groups A,B and C1 combined and C2, D and E groups combined. However, it is notable that for the better off A, B and C1 groups, 72% of those declaring a mental illness noted depression related problems. This rose to 80% for the less well-off C2, D and E groups. It would be perhaps more informative if the data for each SEC grouping were provided separately to see the real picture across the SEC groupings.

The survey is also notable in that it failed to ask a key question. In answer to questions about ‘What are your main sources of stress?’ the majority (71 %) cited work from university (67% SEC A,B,C1) and (74% SEC C2,D,E). Other questions related to: Family; Friends; Romantic relationship; A job or internship; Don't get stressed; Employment prospects after university; Other; I don’t get stressed and Don’t know. But a question or questions about financial problems were not asked. This failure to pose such pertinent questions, and the possible motivation behind not doing so, tends to invalidate the whole study. It is precisely these questions that need to be addressed.

Is there hope on the horizon?

The recent announcement in June, by Sam Gyimah the Higher Education Minister, of a new package of measures on student mental health offers some hope and acknowledgement from government that there is indeed an increasing problem of poor mental health amongst our students [14]. That he chose to make the announcement at Bristol University probably reflects the recent adverse publicity about student suicides there: see TEFS Blog Tragedy on Campus – now is the time to act to prevent suicides and mental distress [15]. The minister calls for the establishment of a “University Mental Health Charter” that will see the development of new standards to promote student and staff mental health and wellbeing. A good idea but there is scant attention paid the plight of students under crushing financial pressure.

With so many young people about to embark upon their education after school in the next few weeks, it would be good if they could get better access to financial help as well as ‘mental wellbeing’ help in the coming months and years.

Mike Larkin, retired from Queen's University Belfast after 37 years teaching Microbiology, Biochemistry and Genetics

If you are distressed then the BBC support site offers a comprehensive series of contact details for organisations such the Samaritans (Phone: 116 123 24 hours) and HOPELineUK that offer support, practical advice and information to young people considering suicide and can also offer help and advice if you’re concerned about someone you know. Phone: 0800 068 41 41. In Northern Ireland there is Lifeline that provides support to people suffering distress or despair in Northern Ireland, regardless of age or district( Phone: 0808 808 8000 (24 hours a day). See:
Nightline has a searchable site that gives links to volunteers in your local area. See:


[1] Times Higher Education. August 15, 2018.Dutch doctors warn student mental health problems are rising.

[2] NL Times August 14, 2018. More Dutch students struggle with psychological problems, university doctors say. August 14, 2018.

[3] BBC News 30 September 2017. Mental health: 10 charts on the scale of the problem

[4] NHS Digital September 29, 2016. Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Survey: Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing, England, 2014.

[5] House of Commons Briefing Paper Number 6988, 25 April 2018. Mental health statistics for England: prevalence, services and funding.

[6] Mental health Foundation. Mental health statistics: poverty

[7] Mental Health Foundation statistics.

[8] Mental health in Northern Ireland: Fundamental Facts

[9] OECD 2014. Mental Health and Work: Netherlands.

[10] University World News 5 June 2014 Issue No:323. Political deal to replace student grants with loans.

[11] MINDING OUR FUTURE Universities UK.

[12] Universities UK 25 September 2017. Are there ‘huge dropout rates’ at the UK’s universities?’s-universities.aspx

[13] YouGov Survey 2016. One in four students suffer from mental health problems.

[14] Government News June 2018. New package of measures announced on student mental health.

[15] TEFS Blog June 15, 2018. Tragedy on Campus – now is the time to act to prevent suicides and mental distress.


Popular posts from this blog

Qfqual builds a concrete wall: UPDATED

UPDATE 8th August 2020 Things are moving fast today with severe criticism mounting about Ofqual and SQA, and urgent action is needed. TEFS has laid out ten points that should be considered to reverse out of the crumbling mess. Fairness should replace 'maintaining standards' as the primary objective. The government must cease trying to defend a system that acts as a barrier to the less advantaged. Since posting yesterday, things have been moving fast. Today the Guardian put the examinations issue in large print on its front page with ‘Nearly 40% of A-level result predictions to be downgraded in England’ . This conclusion came about after some great detective work by former medical statistician, Huy Duong, who analysed the data available and reconciled this with the Ofqual announcement that there could have been a 12% inflation in higher grades. It seems that Ofqual have been caught red handed and "Duong’s findings were privately confirmed to the Guardian by ex

A radical overhaul of examinations is needed as soon as possible: UPDATE

UPDATE 23rd March 2021 Since this idea was posted in January, there has been considerable thought across the sector about what would be best for the future. These are very well laid out in a collection of short essays reported last week by the Higher Education Policy Institute (HEPI). The twelve essays, from different authors and different perspectives, in  ‘Where next for university admissions? ’ are edited by Rachel Hewitt  who sets out the many pitfalls surrounding examinations and university admissions. It seems there are those in favour of post qualification admission (PQA) to university as it should help the least advantaged students. However, arguments against this are presented that means caution must be taken. A powerful response to the HEPI report by the  'The Fair Access Coalition: 10 requirements for a fair admissions process' adds further to the debate. The suggestions are sensible but falls short on demanding adequate resources for students throughout their studi

The next labour of Ofqual is announced: Social mobility UPDATE

UPDATE 1st March2021  Since writing this post, there has been valuable analysis added to the worsening situation by Lee Elliot-Major, Chair of Social Mobility at Exeter University and former head of the Sutton Trust. His article in The Guardian today, ‘How do we ensure disadvantaged kids don't lose out in England's new exam system?’  concludes that “it will be long after this summer’s exam grade battles that we will comprehend the full consequences this pandemic has had on young people.” That could be an understatement as the idea of ‘social mobility’ unravels fast. He cites a recent research publication with colleagues at the LSE Centre for Economic Performance  entitled  ‘Unequal learning and labour market losses in the crisis: consequences for social mobility’ . This is a detailed and rigorous analysis and survey that should set alarm bells ringing in government in the run-up to the budget this week. The evidence is stark as the “education and labour market losses due to C