Skip to main content

Take me to your leader: Then again………….

Even if aliens landed in England overnight, the first encounter might have gone unnoticed as the results of the election came in. What do we say to the advanced guard of a more advanced civilisation when they ask “take me to your leader”? Many of us might decide that it is not a good idea to seek out our leaders. Instead, we should carefully reflect upon what the alien visitors might make of us. Then extend this thinking to the attitude of the rest of our planet toward our position.

If aliens had landed, they would probably be detained in one of our immigration processing centres by now while someone decided what to do with them. Meanwhile the alien visitors would reflect upon what they had researched and the wisdom of travelling here at all. They would reach the conclusion that the UK was incapable of achieving a trade deal with their neighbours, never mind the intergalactic deal they were proposing. They would see that our leaders seem to be chosen on the basis of popularity and not on their honesty or capability.

Facts are blurred into the background as people are misled. The unequal society we display to them is dominated by those with more resources and not those with ability. The leader that they seek is part of an ’elite’ clique that has arisen from the most privileged in a society that seems happy to elect them. More surprising would be the realisation that political leadership on science and technology is in the hands of a Minister of State for Universities, Science, Research and Innovation who is an expert in medieval history. With the environment on earth degrading fast, the scientific political leadership would seem to be lacking understanding and a sense of urgency as the crisis deepens.

What the future might hold for universities.

The simple answer is that there will be no change. The conservative manifesto made no promises of change on university and student finance other than a vague promise of a review. The conclusions of the Augar report earlier this year have been lost in the long grass. The prospect of Brexit has frozen universities into complete stasis as they cannot effectively plan ahead. With no real idea of how research funding will develop in the absence of the EU influence, they sit and wait. But today they know that Brexit is a reality and no deal is the outcome they must prepare for. The impact on international collaborations will be profound and they will have to lobby hard to regain their positions. It is time that universities provided more foresight and leadership in what is becoming a very deep crisis. Unfortunately, they will most likely seek further fee rises to compensate for the loss of EU research income.

What can students expect? Equality, fairness?

The simple answer is again, more of the same. However, they will also see an escalation in the numbers of temporary contract lecturers teaching them. Indeed, the privatisation of all public services will pile up around them. As they prepare for the world of work, they will initially fail to see the erosion of employee protections creeping up behind. By the time they realise, it will be too late. Protections gained by generations before them will disappear as we move toward a USA system of ‘hire and fire’ mentality. The idea of protected pensions will also disappear as they invest in precarious schemes that line the pockets of the fund managers. Worse, they will realise that their unsecured government loans for university education were being creamed off as profit by the private sector and backed by their repayments and tax. The unsecured loan debt in the UK is rising fast with student loans leading the way.

The generation gap widens.

The idea that there will be a backlash against the newly elected government will take hold over the next five years. Most young people did not support Brexit and are not readily disposed to supporting the Conservatives and their pro-Brexit stance. This discontent will expand as more young people come onto the electoral register. The idea of fairness and equality will expand as they realise that widening participation is an illusion created by the government.

Another stark fact will emerge quickly. The ’first past the post’ system skews the perception of support for Brexit that is also an illusion. The majority Conservative government today was elected by 43.6% of the electorate. When combined with the pro-Brexit vote for the Brexit party, it comes to just short of 46%. In contrast, the combined Labour, Liberal Democrat, Green Party and Scottish Nationalist Party vote for Remain/second referendum comes to over 50%. Calls for a second referendum will continue with young people seeking wider support for their position.

One nation government is a dead concept.

The results in Scotland revealed a wide rift between the Scottish people and the rest of the UK. Brexit will lead to a second independence referendum with the most likely outcome being a separate Scotland. The current divergence in Higher Education will widen further. But we should beware. Nationalism is a powerful force that should be contained. Instead, it will lead to more xenophobia in both England and Scotland as it rises. Meanwhile a lone piper can be heard faintly in the hills around Edinburgh sounding the lament for the last outpost of Labour.

Then raise the scarlet standard high
Beneath its folds we'll live and die
Though cowards flinch and traitors sneer
We'll keep the red flag flying here...…………………………………….

Mike Larkin, retired from Queen's University Belfast after 37 years teaching Microbiology, Biochemistry and Genetics.


Popular posts from this blog

Bristol University student death: Inquest raises many concerns

The inquest into the tragic death of Bristol University Student, Ben Murray, took place this week; almost 12 months since he took his own life.* The coroner recorded a verdict of suicide earlier today but warned the University that it should make detailed inquiries after each death (BBC News ‘University of Bristol told to learn lessons after Ben Murray's suicide’ ). The anniversary of his death is this Sunday the 5th of May. Spring comes as a time of hope for most people but for others it can be a time of considerable anxiety and stress. This is especially the case for students approaching the examination period. As a close colleague of mine often pointed out, “they are all someone’s child”. Our hearts go out to the family of Ben Murray and friends as the inquest goes over again the events of a year ago. The pain is further exacerbated by media reports that he had little or no support in what was his first year at university. The BBC reported that ‘Bristol University studen

A radical overhaul of examinations is needed as soon as possible: UPDATE

UPDATE 23rd March 2021 Since this idea was posted in January, there has been considerable thought across the sector about what would be best for the future. These are very well laid out in a collection of short essays reported last week by the Higher Education Policy Institute (HEPI). The twelve essays, from different authors and different perspectives, in  ‘Where next for university admissions? ’ are edited by Rachel Hewitt  who sets out the many pitfalls surrounding examinations and university admissions. It seems there are those in favour of post qualification admission (PQA) to university as it should help the least advantaged students. However, arguments against this are presented that means caution must be taken. A powerful response to the HEPI report by the  'The Fair Access Coalition: 10 requirements for a fair admissions process' adds further to the debate. The suggestions are sensible but falls short on demanding adequate resources for students throughout their studi

Higher Education and the ‘intelligent plumbers’ theory

A common tactic when found out is to divert attention elsewhere. The release of student data from 2018/19 by the Department for Education (DfE) yesterday, ‘Widening participation in higher education: 2020’ and ‘Statistics: further education and skills’ tells the same sorry tale of a wide gap in access to universities between the most and least advantaged students. To divert attention from these stark facts in advance, the government used a diversionary tactic by attacking the effectiveness of universities and thus pointing the blame for poor social mobility someplace else. Advocating improvements in further education, something cut back by the same regime for years, hides the real intention. It seems that class divisions will be further exacerbated and any concession to universities fuelling improved social mobility has been abandoned. But the flawed theory is that at least the elite rulers will get access to intelligent plumbers . Three years ago, I heard a leading ‘You